Is open innovation relevant for teaching and learning?

For our most recent assignment, we were asked to research an area of openness previously unfamiliar to us. As someone who has spent most of my career in commercial roles, I was particularly interested to discover an approach that balances openness with commercial viability – open innovation. I had not previously come across this term, although I have seen the concept in action.

Open innovation covers a range of ways in which organisations use external knowledge to help their innovation processes, including acquiring knowledge from others, licencing innovations for use by others, or partners gaining privileged access to each other’s knowledge. It has been defined as “the use of purposive inflows and outflows of knowledge to accelerate internal innovation, and expand the markets for external use of innovation, respectively” (Chesbrough et al, 2006).

We were asked to consider five specific questions.

1)    who is/are the main spokesperson(s) for this initiative

It’s hard to identify one in particular, but the term “open innovation” was coined by American academic Henry Chesborough (2003), in his book, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology. His starting point was investigating why Xerox developed so many groundbreaking technologies, which they then failed to exploit. His research suggested that the technologies needed to be exploited in a different environment, in other words they were insufficiently open. Companies cited as using open innovation include Procter & Gamble, Cisco Systems, Philips Electronics, IBM and Fiat.

2)    where the research and activity around it is occurring

All over the world – significant recent research has come from Asian academics, perhaps reflecting the sophistication of many Asian technology companies.

3)    why it appears to be happening now or in this form (which are the apparent drivers and motivators)

Open innovation is not a new approach, but seems to be becoming more popular. The reasons are not entirely clear but probably include advances in communication technology, globalisation and the increasing complexity of innovation.

4)    what product(s) or progress is/are apparent

Some companies are using open innovation very successfully but others are being held back by their managerial processes and culture, for example the “not invented here” syndrome (Lichtenthaler, 2011)

5)    how these might connect now, or in the future, with learning and teaching activity.

Learning and teaching tends to be by its nature more “open” than commerce, but issues of value capture cannot be completely ignored. This is particularly relevant for me as I work for a for-profit education provider, where considerations of openness must be balanced with commercial ones. This is not always taken into account in discussions, as observed by Chesbrough et al (2006),

“While open-source shares the focus on value creation throughout an industry value chain, its proponents usually deny or downplay the importance of value capture”

This can be naïve and lead to practices that are not sustainable. Like it or not (and many don’t), all universities are being forced to be more commercial in their outlook and think about how they are funded. This may mean that those in education have something to learn from the open innovation approach that balances openness with being commercially viable.

References:

Chesborough, H. (2003) Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

Chesborough, H. Vanhaverbeke, W. & West, J. (Eds.) (2006) Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Lichtenthaler, U. (2011), “Open innovation: past research, current debates, and future directions”, The Academy of Management Perspectives, vol 25 No. 1, pp. 75-93

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under H818 The Networked Practitioner

3 responses to “Is open innovation relevant for teaching and learning?

  1. It’s a good job I picked up on your blog. I do wonder if at times I am doing an different H818. Always good to linkup with someone else who uses WordPress – an example of a vast Open success? I like too that a substantial number of employees of WordPress are dotted around the planet working in an ‘open’ office.

    • Thanks for the comment and like, Jonathan. Why a different H818? I am keen on WordPress who, like a number of other software vendors, use a freemium business model to achieve openness for many users while charging for some features.

  2. Anne Bradbury

    This is a very interesting and thought-provoking post, Daniel.

    I think of the type of setups in ‘silicon valley’ where employees are encouraged to be creative/think ‘outside the box’ but then the companies are big enough to go through the various processes necessary to decide which innovations are carried through into product development. Even then that development process will be stimulated further by other companies developing parallel ideas.

    For smaller companies without the necessary infrastructure (or culture) working with others is a viable option.

    As we know, innovation/creativity are necessary to keep the competitive edge – those that stand still end up behind!

    It is an interesting balance, as you say.

    Anne

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s